The technologies behind this kind of nude AI, which can generate or adjust images to make them NSFW and produce any number of illegal sex acts on your computer screen raises a host of ethical issues. While some might say that if you use the AI well this is okay, it has a high potential for misuse, exploitation and harm. I hope that the ethical use of nude AI involves regulations, consent and heavy content moderation but even then they are fraught with risks.
Most consideration about nude AI touches in some way on the issue of consent. Much of the AI-generated porn is created without permission or knowledge from the subjects and this can lead to very real harms. This includes, for example, the use of deepfake technologies to generate non-consensual pornographic videos based on named and everyday people that leads all too often to reputational harm. According to a report published in 2020 by Sensity AI, more than ninety-six percent of deepfake videos were related to non-consensual pornography. This points to a large scale misuse of this technology and the impact it can potentially have on an individual, specifically women who are generally found at the receiving end.
On the legal side of things, unlicensed AI-generated nudity can mean a lot more trouble. Quite a few nations have adopted or in the process of adopting legislation against revenge porn and non-consent pornography, which may also apply to auto-generated explicit material. For instance, it can provide a maximum jail sentence of two years, since the Criminal Justice and Courts Act was passed in 2015 to specifically target those who share private sexual pictures. In the US, a number of states have enacted so-called “revenge porn” laws that could encompass AI generation of nudity. Thus, misuse of nude AI on a photo can be punished under privacy laws in addition to ethical harm.
But here are some very specific and limited-niche use-cases where it is theoretically possible for Nude AI to be used responsibly. In such fields as art and fashion, AI has been used to create stylized human shapes, providing a digital sandbox for artists desiring to experiment with physical forms or make safe-for-work artistic nudes. This technology might serve a purpose in these controlled environments — where consent is explicit and everyone knows the ethical boundaries. There are, however narrow uses but this mandates rigorous checks and balances to prevent AI from being abused or malevolently guided for nefarious purposes.
On the other hand, AI technology developers must produce technologies that can be used properly. Platforms like those making or hosting nude AI need to invest in some automatic moderation system that can identify and remove non-consensual & harmful creations. For instance, OpenAI has managed the introduction of a moderation system in their GPT models to filter content such as inappropriate images or language. In the same way, if a platform enables user-generated content they have got to get robust guidelines and protections towards any fake use of bare AI.
The problems with naked AI are, of course -- as well you might expect - globe-spanning. This impersonality of the internet and accessibility to AI tools can lead a person to put aside rules, boundaries or restrictions against regulating it properly. Deepfake porn in particular has resulted in a number of high-profile lawsuits following the creation of nonconsensual fake nudes, with victims frequently lacking a realistic means to stop all copies from being shared.
So in summation, while it could be argued nude AI may technically have its uses such as art (art being natural judgement) and education or consensual projects, the wider knock-on effect means that it is arguably a high-risk technological field. It would need to be heavily regulated, censor any inappropriate stories or media automatically and must respect personal consent and privacy. To read more about the ethical implications and potential applications of this tech, please visit nude ai to get see what else is being developed in AI-generated content.